Comparison between floppy Nissen and Nissen Rossetti fundoplication: the significance of short gastric vessels division

In this video, we present the surgical treatment of a typical gastroesophageal reflux disease in a young woman. She suffers from PPI tolerance, regurgitation with ENT symptoms, some asthma that usually is an indirect sign of very important regurgitation problems. That’s probably the best indication for anti-reflux surgery because everything can be controlled by medication. This is a very teaching video in which all technical details and all landmarks of the procedure are well illustrated.

Naviguez dans
l'Université Virtuelle

Comparison   between   floppy   Nissen   and   Nissen   Rossetti   fundoplication:   the   significance   of   short   gastric   vessels   division

Authors
Abstract
In this video, we present the surgical treatment of a typical gastroesophageal reflux disease in a young woman. She suffers from PPI tolerance, regurgitation with ENT symptoms, some asthma that usually is an indirect sign of very important regurgitation problems. That’s probably the best indication for anti-reflux surgery because everything can be controlled by medication. This is a very teaching video in which all technical details and all landmarks of the procedure are well illustrated.
Catégorie
basic techniques
Mots-clés
Type de vidéo
Durée
17'28''
Publication
2009-10
Popularité
Favoris
Favorites Media
Audio
en
Sous-titres
en
E-publication
WeBSurg.com, Oct 2009;9(10).
URL: http://www.websurg.com/doi-vd01en2646.htm

Comparison   between   floppy   Nissen   and   Nissen   Rossetti   fundoplication:   the   significance   of   short   gastric   vessels   division

9. Creation of floppy valve 10'25''
So you see, we have divided the posterior attachments of this gastric fundus and you can imagine what will happen when we will compare with the Nissen Rossetti’s, we will have a very floppy valve. Very short mobilization, I will grab the posterior aspect of the gastric fundus on the right side, and you see the difference is that I have no tension at all on my right valve, everything is staying in place. That is probably one of the safety reasons why we find that this fundic mobilization is very safe. The other thing is that you can imagine that when you have a more flexible system, relaxation properties are better with this system than with the Nissen Rossetti, and that is something that was shown is some of those randomized trials, the relaxation was a little bit different for the floppy than for the Nissen Rossetti. If your sphincter is relaxing, it means that you have less side-effects than with the Nissen Rossetti, that is our experience at least. This is the left crus, you see that the aorta is not that far, so if you are going this way, you will puncture the aorta. It is very important to have this clear view that we have today. I am always checking the position of the vena cava on the side. You see that we have respected the peritoneal coverage of the crus, and I think that it increases the strength of the repair. I think that is why I insist on the landmarks when I start because if you identify easily your right crus, you can respect this peritoneal protection on the crus. This patient is very thin, the position of the esophagus is very high but if I am closing there, I will create some angulation. So if you make too much of a posterior repair, you have this angulation. Moreover, you will put a fundoplication there. I prefer to leave it quite open there to avoid this angulation of the GE junction, and maybe that after creating the fundoplication, I will come back with one more stitch. This is my bougie; I am not fixing the first stitch, so I can see the tightness of the valve. For example, you can see that I am very floppy and I could use a 50 French bougie without any problems. This is why I like to fix the first stitch to get the aspect of the tissues, be sure that I’m not twisting any part of the gastric fundus, then when you have this aspect, you can place the valve in the right position and be sure that you are not tightening the second stitch. That is quite helpful when working in this way. Sometimes when you suture along the greater curvature like that, you get a hematoma of the wrap, do you think that is important or is there a way to avoid it? I’ve had some of course, but never seen any consequences because I am used to performing a swallow on the first day after surgery because I like to see the position of the valve and the tightness of the valve. With or without hematoma, I can’t see the difference in terms of esophageal emptying so I don’t think it is a big issue. All the mechanisms should be able to work together, the esophagus is moving because of the peristalsis, you have more than 2,000 movements a day when people are swallowing, and I like to have this mechanism. What I like is not to fix on the esophagus because it is quite fragile, but just here on the insertion of the phrenoesophageal ligament, so it’s a little bit stronger than the esophageal wall, so I like to fix my valve in this position. I still put a posterior suture, but I think you are right. Moving together with the esophagus, that’s why I personally don’t like to fix the valve on the diaphragm because I have one sort of fixed part, and the other, which is moving inside. What I was telling you is that for this sort of anatomy, you have the esophagus coming down, and then you have this angle, and if you put another stitch there, you increase the angle, so I will probably leave it like this. You have only two stitches in your wrap there? Yes that’s right. Another advantage of having a very floppy valve is that we have no tension at all on these sutures so I don’t think it is necessary to put three or four sutures. But again it is surgeon-dependent; OK here is the stitch for Michael.